James F. Boyle

James F. Boyle, Copyright Attorney in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Over 42 years of legal practice · focused on Copyright, Patent, and Trademark · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

ShareholderatBoyle Fredrickson, S.C.

Milwaukee, WI

Practicing copyright in Milwaukee since 1984.

42+
Years practicing
5.0 ★
1 client review
1
Bar admission

Are you James F. Boyle?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

James F. Boyle is a shareholder based in Milwaukee, WI. The practice focuses on Copyright, Patent, and Trademark. James has over 42 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Based in
Milwaukee, WI
Experience
over 42 years
Known for
Copyright · Patent · Trademark
  • Handles Copyright, Patent, and Trademark matters from Milwaukee, WI.
  • Over 42 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
  • Recognized with AV Preeminent.

About James F. Boyle: James F. Boyle is a shareholder based in Milwaukee, WI. The practice focuses on Copyright, Patent, and Trademark. James has over 42 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Areas of practice

Practice areas handled by James F. Boyle

James concentrates on copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secrets. Each area below outlines the kind of case James handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

Copyright cases in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

James takes copyright matters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before James agrees to represent you.

Patent cases in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

James takes patent matters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before James agrees to represent you.

Trademark cases in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

James takes trademark matters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before James agrees to represent you.

Trade Secrets cases in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

James takes trade secrets matters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before James agrees to represent you.

Biography

About James F. Boyle — Over 42 years of Wisconsin copyright experience

James F. Boyle is a shareholder based in Milwaukee, WI. The practice focuses on Copyright, Patent, and Trademark. James has over 42 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Jim Boyle is one of the founders of the firm and was president for several years, Jim has more than 35 years of experience in commercial and intellectual property litigation. He has a deep knowledge of engineering and concentrates on clients’ broader business issues, forging a fit between those issues and a sound legal strategy.

In addition to preparing and prosecuting both patent and trademark applications, Jim has successfully litigated many cases involving patent infringement, trademark infringement, trade secret misappropriation and copyright infringement of misappropriated architectural works in both federal and state courts.

Noteworthy Cases

Blazer v. Best Bee Brothers LLC and RSP, Inc.

Representing defendant in patent infringement action. Case currently on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Kohler Co. v. Whistling Oak Apartments LLC

Represented defendant accused of infringing plaintiff’s trademark on Whistling Straits golf course.

Mikkelsen Graphic Engineering, Inc. (MGE) v. Zund America, Inc. et al.

Represented Swiss-based defendant Zund Systemtechnik AG, its U.S. subsidiary Zund America, Inc. and five employees in a seven-year long lawsuit in federal court in Milwaukee that involved allegations of infringement of seven patents plus seven common law counts for misappropriation of trade secret relating to computer controlled graphics digital cutting systems. The case included an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Successfully obtained dismissal of ten of the twelve causes of action, with the final two being resolved by settlement.

Clear With Computers, LLC v. Trek Bicycle Corporation et al.

Represented defendant Trek Bicycle Corporation in federal court in Texas for infringement of patents relating to web-based marketing proposals.

Playworld v. BCI Burke

Represented playground equipment manufacturer BCI Burke LLC in trade dress and trademark infringement action in federal court in Philadelphia.

ICH Intellectual Capital Holdings, Inc. v. Badger Meter, Inc., et al.

Represented defendant Badger Meter, Inc. in patent infringement action in federal court in Texas alleging infringement of two patents relating to immersion probes used for measuring gas content in molten metals and steel. Case still pending (3/2/07).

Rydex v. BadgerMeter, Inc.

Representing defendant Midwest Instrument Company (Minco) in patent infringement action pending in federal court in Texas alleging infringement of two patents relating to automated meter reading (AMR) system.

Heraeus Electro-Nite Co. v. Midwest Instrument Company, Inc.

Represented defendant Midwest Instrument Company (Minco) in patent infringement action in federal court in Philadelphia alleging infringement of patent relating to immersion probes used for measuring gas content in molten metals and steel.

Shock-Tek, LLC v. Trek Bicycle Corp.

Represented defendant Trek Bicycle Corporation in federal court in Detroit alleging patent infringement, trade dress infringement and false representation under the federal Lanham Act, unfair competition in violation of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, and common law claims of unfair competition and unjust enrichment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Trek.

Schwarz Pharma Inc. and Cima Labs, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Ultimate Formulations, Inc. d/b/a Best Formulations

Represented defendant in pharmaceutical case. Plaintiff, who claimed to have developed an innovative, orally disintegrating tablet used for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome, contended that the defendants had illegally conspired to develop and market a knock-off drug. The complaint alleged a myriad of claims, including patent infringement, copyright infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false advertising in violation of the federal Lanham Act, fraudulent representation and fraudulent drug advertising in violation of Wisconsin Statutes, common law unfair competition and misappropriation, and also sought a declaratory judgment that the defendants’ drug product was being unlawfully substituted by pharmacists for the plaintiffs’ drug in violation of FDA regulations. We obtained a complete dismissal of the defendant manufacturer, Best Formulations.

Hicklin Engineering, L.C. v. R.J. Bartell & Associates, LLC

Represented defendant in trade secret case. Defendant Bartell provided independent engineering design and drafting services for several years in connection with plaintiff’s automotive transmission dynamometer and diagnostic equipment. When Bartell sought to end the relationship after a falling-out with new owners, plaintiff sued, asserting a myriad of claims including breach of an implied contract of confidentiality, misappropriation of trade secrets under the Wisconsin Uniform Trade Secret Act, and common law claims for misappropriation, conversion, replevin and to quiet title to personal property. We obtained summary judgment for Bartell.

Lee Middleton Original Dolls, Inc. v. Seymour Mann, Inc.

Represented defendant in case alleging infringement of certain doll designs. Plaintiff, which designs and sells collectable dolls, contended that defendant was selling knock-offs of its designs, and asserted causes of action for copyright infringement, trade dress infringement, Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin under the Lanham Act, and federal trademark dilution.

Anderson v. International Engineering & Manufacturing.

Represented defendant in patent infringement action involving snowmobile studs. Obtained summary judgment from the federal district court in Minnesota ruling that the plaintiff’s patent was invalid and unenforceable, which was affirmed in a 1998 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Harley Davidson Inc. v. Selectra International Designs. Ltd,

Represented defendant in trademark infringement action. After client’s original counsel had allowed $4.5 million judgment to be entered against the client, was able to have judgment vacated, and ultimately settled case for less than $100K.

Husco International v. Finite Hone, Inc.

Represented defendant in trade secret misappropriation action. In 1996 trial, court ruled that a former employee had not misappropriated plaintiff’s trade secrets, and had not breached a confidentiality agreement with the company.

Wagner v. John Glasspiegel Co.

Represented plaintiff in bench trial for case involving copyright infringement and partnership dissolution.

Jim has represented clients as both plaintiffs and defendants in numerous other patent, trademark and copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation lawsuits throughout the United States.

News & Publications

• Patent Quantity and Quality Issues Up For Debate

• New Domain Names May Impact IP Rights

• Potential Patent Reform Measures Come Under Fire

• James F. Boyle named to Wisconsin Super Lawyers

Awards & Recognitions

• Best Lawyers in America for work in Patent Law and Patent Litigation (2010 to present)

• Named “Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers in America for work in Patent Law (2015 and 2018) and Litigation – Intellectual Property (2014 and 2017)

• Super Lawyers (2005-Present)

• Wisconsin Law Journal – Leader in the Law (2013)

• Chambers and Partners

- Category: Intellectual Property: Leading Individuals: James Boyle, Band 1

- Category: Intellectual Property Litigation, Star Individuals: James Boyle

Professional Activities

• State Bar of Wisconsin (Litigation and Intellectual Property Law Sections)

• American Bar Association (Litigation, Intellectual Property, and Science and Technology Sections)

• Milwaukee and Waukesha County Bar Associations

• American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA).

• Wisconsin Intellectual Property Law Association (WIPLA).

- Board of Directors, 2003-2005

• Fellow of the American Bar Foundation, 2008-Present

• Fellow of the Wisconsin Bar Foundation, 2013-Present

• Litigation Counsel of America, Fellow 2013 – Present

• Inns of Court of America, Thomas E. Fairchild Chapter (Wis.) Master 2012-2020

• Wisconsin Law Journal, Leaders in the Law, 2013

• Marquette University Alumni Association

- Engineering National Advisory Council, 2005-2011

- National Board of Directors, 1996 to 2000

- President, Engineering Alumni Association, 1994-1995

- Engineering Board of Directors, 1990-1996

James's approach to copyright cases

Jim Boyle is one of the founders of the firm and was president for several years, Jim has more than 35 years of experience in commercial and intellectual property litigation. He has a deep knowledge of engineering and concentrates on clients’ broader business issues, forging a fit between those issues and a sound legal strategy. In addition to preparing and prosecuting both patent and trademark…

The kind of cases James takes

James reviews new inquiries case-by-case for copyright, patent, and trademark matters in Milwaukee and the surrounding Wisconsin area.

Credentials

James F. Boyle's legal education and bar admissions

  • Marquette University Law School

    J.D. · 1984

  • Marquette University

    B.S. Mechanical · 1981

Jurisdictions

James's state bar admissions

  • Wisconsin U.S. Distr

    1984 · ACTIVE

James studied at J.D. in Marquette University Law School and B.S. Mechanical in Marquette University.

Law school and academic background

James completed J.D. in Marquette University Law School and B.S. Mechanical in Marquette University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice James runs in Wisconsin is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Recognition

Awards, publications, and recognition of James F. Boyle

James has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.

  • AV Preeminent

Legal awards and honors

AV Preeminent.

Affiliations

James's professional memberships and bar associations

  • State Bar of Wisconsin American Bar Association Milwaukee and Waukesha County Bar Associations American Intellectual Property Law Association

    AIPLA) Wisconsin Intellectual Property Law Association (WIPLA · membership

Locations

James F. Boyle's office in Milwaukee

James's primary office is at 840 North Plankinton Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53203. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.

840 North Plankinton Avenue

Milwaukee, WI 53203

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of James F. Boyle — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

Every review below is from a verified client of James. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing copyright attorneys in Milwaukee.

5.0

1 client review

Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once James F. Boyle claims this profile.

Read all reviews

Hiring guide

How to hire James F. Boyle — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new copyright attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with James usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

James charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain James's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; James will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a copyright attorney in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

A short list to run through before you commit: How many copyright matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for James

James discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in copyright practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every copyright matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. James confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

James's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many copyright practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about James F. Boyle

  • How much does it cost to hire James for a copyright case?

    Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. James walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

  • Does James offer a free consultation?

    James charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain James's office. Some copyright attorneys offer free consults — check James's current terms during booking.

  • How long do copyright cases in Wisconsin typically take?

    Simple copyright matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. James gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

  • Can James take my case if I'm outside Milwaukee?

    James is licensed in Wisconsin. Matters governed by Wisconsin law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — James will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

  • What should I bring to my first meeting with James?

    Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. James will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

  • Is James accepting new copyright clients right now?

    James's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

Copyright attorneys serving Milwaukee, Madison and Waukesha in Wisconsin

James handles copyright matters throughout Wisconsin. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified copyright attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If James's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these copyright attorneys in Milwaukee handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.