Kathryn MK Horn — Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
Over 33 years of legal practice · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
Washington, DC
Practicing law in Washington since 1993.
- 33+
- Years practicing
- 5.0 ★
- 1 client review
- 3
- Bar admissions
Are you Kathryn MK Horn?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Kathryn MK Horn is an attorney based in Washington, DC. Kathryn has over 33 years of legal experience. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
- Based in
- Washington, DC
- Experience
- over 33 years
- Known for
- legal services
- Over 33 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Kathryn MK Horn: Kathryn MK Horn is an attorney based in Washington, DC. Kathryn has over 33 years of legal experience. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.
Biography
Kathryn MK Horn, legal attorney serving Washington
Kathryn MK Horn is an attorney based in Washington, DC. Kathryn has over 33 years of legal experience. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review. Kathryn works from Washington, District of Columbia and takes on legal matters across the region.
Kathryn MK Horn is a lawyer. Kathryn MK received a B.S. degree from University of Florida in 1990, and has been licensed for 33 years. Kathryn MK practices in Washington, DC.
The kind of cases Kathryn takes
Kathryn reviews new inquiries case-by-case across a general legal practice in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.
Credentials
Credentials — where Kathryn studied and practices
Duke University
J.D. · 1993
University of Florida
B.S. · 1990
Jurisdictions
Kathryn's state bar admissions
District of Columbia
1999 · ACTIVE
New York
1997 · ACTIVE
Texas
1993 · ACTIVE
Kathryn studied at J.D. in Duke University and B.S. in University of Florida.
Law school and academic background
Kathryn completed J.D. in Duke University and B.S. in University of Florida. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Kathryn runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Affiliations
Kathryn's professional memberships and bar associations
State Bar of Texas
membership
Locations
Kathryn MK Horn's office in Washington
Kathryn's primary office is at 2300 N. St. N.W., Washington, DC, 20037-1122. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of Kathryn MK Horn — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review
Every review below is from a verified client of Kathryn. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing legal attorneys in Washington.
5.0
1 client review
Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Kathryn MK Horn claims this profile.
Read all reviewsHiring guide
How to hire Kathryn MK Horn — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new legal attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Kathryn usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Kathryn charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Kathryn's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Kathryn will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a legal attorney in Washington, District of Columbia
A short list to run through before you commit: How many legal matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Kathryn
Kathryn discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in legal practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every legal matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Kathryn confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Kathryn's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many legal practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Kathryn MK Horn
How much does it cost to hire Kathryn for a legal case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Kathryn walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Kathryn offer a free consultation?
Kathryn charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Kathryn's office. Some legal attorneys offer free consults — check Kathryn's current terms during booking.
How long do legal cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple legal matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Kathryn gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Kathryn take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Kathryn is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Kathryn will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Kathryn?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Kathryn will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Kathryn accepting new legal clients right now?
Kathryn's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia
Every city below is a direct link into the search page for verified attorneys serving District of Columbia.
More counsel
Other verified attorneys in District of Columbia
More verified attorneys in District of Columbia handling comparable matters.

Steven A Fredley
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 29

Bridget Michael Rohde
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Rosa M. Koppel
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 22

Cameron Hajaran Tousi
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 21

Joseph John Bottiglieri
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 20

Martin Jacobs
Washington, District of Columbia
5.0· 18