How much does it cost to hire Nathan for a general case?

Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Nathan walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.

Does Nathan offer a free consultation?

Nathan charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Nathan's office. Some general attorneys offer free consults — check Nathan's current terms during booking.

How long do general cases in District of Columbia typically take?

Simple general matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Nathan gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.

Can Nathan take my case if I'm outside Washington?

Nathan is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Nathan will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.

What should I bring to my first meeting with Nathan?

Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Nathan will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.

Is Nathan accepting new general clients right now?

Nathan's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Unclaimed · Is this you?

Nathan D. Finch, General Attorney in Washington, District of Columbia

focused on General and Whistleblower · 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

MemberatMotley Rice LLC

Washington, DC

Trusted general attorney serving Washington.

5.0 ★: 1 client review

Practices in

General Whistleblower

Are you Nathan D. Finch?

This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.

Claim this profile — free

Quick answer

Nathan D. Finch is a member based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on General and Whistleblower. Currently practicing at Motley Rice LLC. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Based in: Washington, DC
Experience: attorney
Known for: General · Whistleblower

Handles General and Whistleblower matters from Washington, DC.
Recognized with AV Preeminent.

Areas of practice

Practice areas handled by Nathan D. Finch

Nathan concentrates on general and whistleblower. Each area below outlines the kind of case Nathan handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.

General cases in Washington, District of Columbia

Nathan takes general matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Nathan agrees to represent you.

Whistleblower cases in Washington, District of Columbia

Nathan takes whistleblower matters in Washington, District of Columbia. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Nathan agrees to represent you.

Biography

About Nathan D. Finch — Attorney of District of Columbia general experience

Nathan D. Finch is a member based in Washington, DC. The practice focuses on General and Whistleblower. Currently practicing at Motley Rice LLC. Rated 5.0 out of 5 from 1 client review.

Nate Finch has over 30 years of experience representing people who were hurt or killed by corporations that put profits over people’s health. Nate is one of only a handful of lawyers in the country who have obtained jury verdicts on behalf of his clients against both asbestos defendants and tobacco defendants.

In the early 1990s Nate represented coal miners who were injured or killed after their employers failed to follow their own safety rules. Beginning in the late 1990s, Nate began representing victims of asbestos exposure. His experience includes both individual cases before juries, as well as multi-plaintiff cases in bench trials before federal district court judges after asbestos companies and shareholders tried to use the bankruptcy process to defeat the claims of approximately 100,000 injured workers. He has extensive experience trying cases involving a wide variety of asbestos-containing products, including gaskets, automotive brakes, floor tiles, joint compounds, baby powder and various forms of insulation.

Two of Nate’s most recent asbestos individual plaintiff jury trials resulted in jury verdicts in favor of his clients-a jury verdict of $3.45 million* for the family of an 80-year-old mesothelioma victim against an asbestos gasket company (Katcham v. John Crane, Inc. Newport News Virginia Circuit Court 2024) and a jury verdict of $2.7 million* in favor of a mesothelioma victim against a power company that used asbestos in its operations (Forehand v. VEPCO, Newport News Virginia Circuit Court 2025). Another relatively recent trial received national attention when he reached a settlement mid-trial against Baby Powder manufacturer Johnson & Johnson.

In bench trials involving asbestos defendants, Nate has tried four cases to judgment where he won verdicts in favor of his clients that exceeded $1 billion* each:

MOTLEY RICE CASE:
In re Bondex ($1.1 billion*) (W.D. Pa. 2013).

PRIOR TO MOTLEY RICE:
In re Owens Corning ($7 billion*) (D.Del. 2005)
In re Armstrong World Industries ($3 billion*) (D. Del. 2006)
In re Turner & Newall ($9 billion*) (D.Del. 2005)

When he isn’t trying cases against asbestos companies, Nate represents individual smokers in cases against Big Tobacco, which intentionally designed their cigarettes to be highly addictive without telling smokers they were doing so. Nate has obtained plaintiffs’ verdicts in several cases for smokers who started smoking in the 1960s (or earlier) before warnings were on the packages. Martindale-Hubbell has recognized Nate as an AV rated attorney for more than 20 years.

Nate was a member of the Virginia Law Review and the Order of the Coif and is a former scholarship athlete on the varsity track and cross-country teams at the University of Virginia.

*Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Awards, Accolades & Recognitions

Best Lawyers

Washington, DC
2026 “Lawyer of the Year” Mass tort litigation / class actions-plaintiffs

2022-2026 Mass tort litigation / class actions-plaintiffs

2023-2026 Personal injury litigation-plaintiffs

2024-2026 Product liability litigation-plaintiffs

American Association for Justice

2013 Wiedemann & Wysocki Award

Benchmark Litigation

2013-2017 Washington, D.C., “Litigation Star”: bankruptcy, general commercial, product liability, securities, white collar crime

Super Lawyers

2012-2017, 2019-2020, 2025 Washington, D.C., Super Lawyers list
Personal injury - products: plaintiff; Personal injury - general: plaintiff; Securities litigation

Chambers USA

2009-2010 “Top Lawyer”: bankruptcy and restructuring

Blog Posts

March 14, 2012

Mesothelioma myth busters: three common misconceptions about mesothelioma Causes, Not Just Cases

by: Nathan D. Finch

News

April 27, 2026

How Civil Litigation Helped Build Safer Workplaces-and Why It Still Matters

by:
Jacob R. Stout

March 30, 2026

The Changing Face of Asbestos-Related Diseases

by:
Vincent L. Greene IV
Christina M. Behm

Nathan's approach to general cases

Clients Nathan works with

Nathan reviews new inquiries case-by-case for general and whistleblower matters in Washington and the surrounding District of Columbia area.

Credentials

Nathan D. Finch's legal education and bar admissions

University of Virginia School of Law
J.D. · 1992
University of Virginia
B.A. · 1989

Nathan studied at J.D. in University of Virginia School of Law and B.A. in University of Virginia.

Law school and academic background

Nathan completed J.D. in University of Virginia School of Law and B.A. in University of Virginia. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Nathan runs in District of Columbia is where that training gets applied to real client questions.

Recognition

Awards, publications, and recognition of Nathan D. Finch

Nathan has received 1 formal recognition from bar associations, industry bodies, and peer-review services.

AV Preeminent

Legal awards and honors

AV Preeminent.

Affiliations

Nathan's professional memberships and bar associations

Associations American Association for Justice The Barristers American Board of Trial Advocates
membership

Locations

Nathan D. Finch's office in Washington

Nathan's primary office is at 401 9th St., NW, Suite 1001, Washington, DC, 20007. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.

Main office

Motley Rice LLC

401 9th St., NW, Suite 1001

Washington, DC 20007

Open in Google Maps

Client feedback

Client reviews of Nathan D. Finch — 5.0/5 rating from 1 verified client review

Every review below is from a verified client of Nathan. Reviews cover communication, case outcome, and value — the three signals that matter most when comparing general attorneys in Washington.

5.0

1 client review

Client ratings are sourced from public records and editorial research. Reviews on LawyersListed are accepted from verified clients once Nathan D. Finch claims this profile.

Read all reviews

Hiring guide

How to hire Nathan D. Finch — what to expect in your first consultation

Working with a new general attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Nathan usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.

Consultation formats and pricing

Nathan charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Nathan's office.

What to bring to your first meeting

Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Nathan will tell you what matters and what doesn't.

Questions to ask a general attorney in Washington, District of Columbia

A short list to run through before you commit: How many general matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?

Fees & payment

Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Nathan

Nathan discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in general practice — ask which fits.

Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options

Every general matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Nathan confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.

Payment methods and payment plans

Nathan's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many general practices work with clients on structured schedules.

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Nathan D. Finch

How much does it cost to hire Nathan for a general case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Nathan walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Nathan offer a free consultation?
Nathan charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Nathan's office. Some general attorneys offer free consults — check Nathan's current terms during booking.
How long do general cases in District of Columbia typically take?
Simple general matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Nathan gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Nathan take my case if I'm outside Washington?
Nathan is licensed in District of Columbia. Matters governed by District of Columbia law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Nathan will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Nathan?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Nathan will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Nathan accepting new general clients right now?
Nathan's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.

Areas served

General attorneys serving Washington and Belize City in District of Columbia

Nathan handles general matters throughout District of Columbia. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified general attorneys in that community.

More counsel

If Nathan's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these general attorneys in Washington handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.