Ryan P. Friel, Business Attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Over 13 years of legal practice · focused on Business, Litigation, and Real Estate
ShareholderatMarshall Dennehey
Philadelphia, PA
Practicing business in Philadelphia since 2013.
- 13+
- Years practicing
- 1
- Bar admission
Practices in
Are you Ryan P. Friel?
This profile was built from public bar records and is still unclaimed. Claim it free to control your photo, bio, and fees — and get client inquiries sent straight to you.
Quick answer
Ryan P. Friel is a shareholder based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Business, Litigation, and Real Estate. Ryan has over 13 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey.
- Based in
- Philadelphia, PA
- Experience
- over 13 years
- Known for
- Business · Litigation · Real Estate
- Handles Business, Litigation, and Real Estate matters from Philadelphia, PA.
- Over 13 years of practice as a licensed attorney.
About Ryan P. Friel: Ryan P. Friel is a shareholder based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Business, Litigation, and Real Estate. Ryan has over 13 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey.
Areas of practice
Legal matters Ryan takes on
Ryan concentrates on business, litigation, real estate, and securities. Each area below outlines the kind of case Ryan handles, typical outcomes to expect, and how the intake process starts.
Business
View other Business attorneys
Litigation
View other Litigation attorneys
Real Estate
View other Real Estate attorneys
Securities
View other Securities attorneys
Business cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Ryan takes business matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Ryan agrees to represent you.
Litigation cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Ryan takes litigation matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Ryan agrees to represent you.
Real Estate cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Ryan takes real estate matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Ryan agrees to represent you.
Securities cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Ryan takes securities matters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Typical engagements include intake calls to scope the issue, review of any records or filings you already have, and a written strategy memo before Ryan agrees to represent you.
Biography
Meet Ryan P. Friel — business lawyer in Philadelphia
Ryan P. Friel is a shareholder based in Philadelphia, PA. The practice focuses on Business, Litigation, and Real Estate. Ryan has over 13 years of legal experience. Currently practicing at Marshall Dennehey.
Ryan is a member of both the Securities & Investments Professional Liability and Privacy and Data Security Practice Groups. He represents FINRA member firms, registered representatives and registered investment advisors in state and federal court as well as in Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration and expungement proceedings in addition to a wide range of investigations, examinations, inquiries and enforcement matters. Ryan’s privacy and data security practice involves defending clients in both privacy-related litigation, and technology related claims and litigation as well as handling regulatory investigations for clients from a wide breadth of industries in matters stemming from data privacy and security incidents.
Prior to joining the firm, Ryan was an Assistant District Attorney in the Economic and Cyber Crimes Unit of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office. In his role as a prosecutor, Ryan gained significant trial experience with a particular focus on white-collar and computer-based crimes. Ryan also worked at FINRA where he assisted in bringing enforcement actions against broker-dealers and their registered representatives. Ryan’s time at FINRA gives him a unique insight into the ever-changing regulatory landscape his clients face, including the protection of financial and personal customer information under the SEC’s Regulation S-P. Ryan began his legal career at a boutique litigation firm where he represented professional athletes in investment fraud cases where he helped recover millions of dollars in losses.
Ryan is a member of the Advisory Board of St. Francis de Sales School, an independent, non-Archdiocesan elementary school located in West Philadelphia that provides a Catholic education to a diverse student body of all faiths and backgrounds most of whom come from economically depressed areas of Philadelphia.
Ryan is a 2008 graduate of Fairfield University where he earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree and a 2012 graduate of Syracuse University College of Law where he graduated cum laude.
Honors & Awards
•Pennsylvania Super Lawyers Rising Star (2023)
CLASSES/SEMINARS TAUGHT
•PLUS Podcast, Managing Cybersecurity Threats in 2024, Episode 2: SEC Amendment's Impact on Compliance and Reporting, July 2024
•Outside Business Activities: Overview and Best Practices for Broker-Dealers, 7th Annual CNA Life Agent and Broker-Dealer Conference, October 5, 2023
Published Works
•'Proposed FINRA Rule 3290-A Regulatory Breakthrough or a Halfhearted Attempt at Real Reform?' The Legal Intelligencer, June 10, 2025
•'DOL's Retirement Security Rule Imposes New Fiduciary Standards on Financial Services, Insurance Industries,' The Legal Intelligencer, May 10, 2024
•'FINRA Proposal Creates Urgency for Brokers Seeking Expungement of Customer Complaints,' The Legal Intelligencer, May 4, 2023
•'FINRA, the SEC and Congress Aim to Safeguard Senior Investors,' The Legal Intelligencer, Co-Author, May 12, 2022
•'The Sale of High Commission Products Under Regulation Best Interest', Aon Advisor Solutions, Fall 2020 Newsletter
Results
$200,000 FINRA case dismissed.
We obtained dismissal of a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) case in which the claimant was seeking in excess of $200,000 in damages. The dismissal was based upon FINRA’s rule setting forth a six-year eligibility period in which a claim may be arbitrated. The claimant made the investments at issue in 2015 but did not file his Statement of Claim until 2022. Claimant’s counsel argued that the “trigger date” for eligibility was in 2018, which is the date the claimant learned of an alleged Ponzi scheme involving the investments. We argued that the eligibility period began on the date of the investments in 2015. The three-member panel of arbitrators unanimously agreed with our position. Motions to dismiss are rarely granted because FINRA encourages its arbitrators to allow claimants the opportunity to present their case on the merits at an evidentiary arbitration proceeding.
Thought Leadership
Proposed FINRA Rule 3290-A Regulatory Breakthrough or a Halfhearted Attempt at Real Reform?
June 10, 2025
In an era of rapid innovation and expanding financial services, the lines between professional roles and personal ventures are blurrier than ever. Against this evolving backdrop, FINRA has introduced Proposed Rule 3290-its most significant attempt in decades to overhaul how it regulates the outside business activities (OBAs) and private securities transactions (PSTs) of registered representatives. This proposed rule seeks to replace two longstanding, often-criticized rules-Rules 3270 and 3280-with a unified framework intended to simplify compliance, reduce ambiguity, and reflect the realities of today’s financial market-place. But is this truly a modernization of outdated regulations or merely a cosmetic update that fails to address the core concerns of broker-dealers and their registered representatives?
Case Law Alerts
Panel Dismisses Claimant’s Claims Without Prejudice in Their Entirety Pursuant to Rule 12504 of the Code for Lack of FINRA Jurisdiction
January 1, 2025
The claimant’s claim related to the alleged unsuitability of her investment in CFSI stock. However, the panel unanimously granted the respondents’, Moody Capital and Rosenstein, motion to dismiss pursuant to FINRA Rule 12504. Specifically, for various reasons, including that the claimant never held a customer account with the respondents containing any of the securities at issue, the panel found the respondents were not associated with the account(s), security(ies) or conduct at issue in the Statement of Claim. Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, January 2025 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. Copyright 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm.
News
Marshall Dennehey Announces 2024 Shareholder Class And Special Counsel Promotions
December 19, 2023
Ryan's approach to business cases
Ryan is a member of both the Securities & Investments Professional Liability and Privacy and Data Security Practice Groups. He represents FINRA member firms, registered representatives and registered investment advisors in state and federal court as well as in Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration and expungement proceedings in addition to a wide range of investigations,…
The kind of cases Ryan takes
Ryan reviews new inquiries case-by-case for business, litigation, and real estate matters in Philadelphia and the surrounding Pennsylvania area.
Credentials
Education, bar admissions, and languages
Syracuse University College of Law
J.D. · 2012
Fairfield University
B.A. · 2008
Jurisdictions
Ryan's state bar admissions
Pennsylvania
2013 · ACTIVE
Ryan studied at J.D. in Syracuse University College of Law and B.A. in Fairfield University.
Law school and academic background
Ryan completed J.D. in Syracuse University College of Law and B.A. in Fairfield University. Formal legal training is one signal of substantive knowledge — the day-to-day practice Ryan runs in Pennsylvania is where that training gets applied to real client questions.
Affiliations
Ryan's professional memberships and bar associations
Associations & memberships Member, Advisory Board of St
membership
Francis de Sales School
membership
Locations
Ryan P. Friel's office in Philadelphia
Ryan's primary office is at 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300, Philadelphia, PA, 19103. In-person meetings are by appointment; a phone intake usually comes first.
Client feedback
Client reviews of Ryan P. Friel
Ryan has not yet collected verified client reviews on LawyersListed. Reviews here are all from confirmed clients; anonymous ratings are moderated out.
No reviews yet
Only verified clients who have consulted with Ryan P. Friel can leave a review.
Schedule your consultationHiring guide
How to hire Ryan P. Friel — what to expect in your first consultation
Working with a new business attorney should feel structured. Here's how the first two conversations with Ryan usually go, from the moment you request a consult to the day representation begins.
Consultation formats and pricing
Ryan charges for the initial consult. That fee is credited toward representation if you retain Ryan's office.
What to bring to your first meeting
Bring any documents you already have — police reports, medical records, filed pleadings, correspondence from an insurer, a copy of the contract at issue. If you're not sure, err on the side of bringing everything; Ryan will tell you what matters and what doesn't.
Questions to ask a business attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
A short list to run through before you commit: How many business matters have you handled in the last year? What's your fee structure? Who else in the office will work on this? What's your realistic estimate of timeline and range of outcomes? How do I reach you between meetings?
Fees & payment
Fees, payment methods, and consultation options for Ryan
Ryan discusses fees during intake so the arrangement fits the matter. Contingency, hourly, and flat-fee options are all common in business practice — ask which fits.
Hourly rates, contingency fees, and flat-fee options
Every business matter is priced differently. Simple document review might be a flat fee. Injury litigation is often contingency. Complex commercial disputes usually run hourly with a retainer. Ryan confirms the model in the engagement letter before any work starts.
Payment methods and payment plans
Ryan's office accepts standard payment methods. Ask about payment plans if the retainer is a stretch — many business practices work with clients on structured schedules.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions about Ryan P. Friel
How much does it cost to hire Ryan for a business case?
Cost depends on the type of matter, the fee model (contingency, flat, hourly), and how contested the case becomes. Ryan walks through the likely range during the consult so there are no surprises.
Does Ryan offer a free consultation?
Ryan charges for the initial consult; that fee is credited toward representation if you retain Ryan's office. Some business attorneys offer free consults — check Ryan's current terms during booking.
How long do business cases in Pennsylvania typically take?
Simple business matters can wrap in a few weeks; disputed cases can run 6–18 months from intake to resolution, longer if the matter goes to trial. Ryan gives a realistic estimate for your facts at the consult — vague answers here are a red flag.
Can Ryan take my case if I'm outside Philadelphia?
Ryan is licensed in Pennsylvania. Matters governed by Pennsylvania law are the natural fit. Out-of-state matters are handled case-by-case, sometimes with local co-counsel. Ask during intake — Ryan will tell you if the case is a fit or refer you to someone closer to your court.
What should I bring to my first meeting with Ryan?
Bring every document that touches the dispute: contracts, correspondence, police or medical reports, filed pleadings, invoices, photographs, insurance letters. Also bring a written timeline of what happened, in your own words. Ryan will filter what matters — over-preparing at intake is always cheaper than needing a second meeting.
Is Ryan accepting new business clients right now?
Ryan's intake status shifts week to week. Submit the form; the office will confirm availability or refer the matter out.
Areas served
Business attorneys serving Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Harrisburg in Pennsylvania
Ryan handles business matters throughout Pennsylvania. Each city below is a direct link into the search page for verified business attorneys in that community.
More counsel
Other top-rated business attorneys in Pennsylvania
If Ryan's intake is full or the fit isn't right, these business attorneys in Philadelphia handle similar matters. Every profile below is verified and open to consultations.
- CA
Carlo A. LaMonica
Moscow, Pennsylvania
5.0· 134
- JR
Jerry Robert Knafo
Allentown, Pennsylvania
5.0· 60
- GG
Gary Green
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5.0· 47
- JG
Jennifer Gilliland Vanasdale Esquire
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
5.0· 47
- ER
Edward Robert Kennett
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
5.0· 39
- GT
Gary T. Vanasdale Esquire
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
5.0· 36